DeepScribe vs Nabla: Which AI Medical Scribe Makes More Sense?
Start with NoPajamaTime's free 24-hour proof to create and review one note.
NoPajamaTime creates a draft outside the EHR. The clinician reviews it, copies only permitted narrative text into an appropriate EHR field, completes structured work separately, and signs inside the EHR. Universal native EHR write-back is not claimed.
Two AI medical scribes with different business models and target customers. Here's what separates them and where each makes sense.
DeepScribe: Group and Enterprise Focus
DeepScribe's model is built around group practice and enterprise sales — physicians buying in multi-provider units, with EHR integrations that require setup by a practice administrator. Their note quality and specialty coverage are well-regarded in specialist physician circles. The price point and procurement model make it less accessible to solo independent physicians.
Nabla: More Individual Access
Nabla has pursued individual physician access more aggressively than most AI scribes, offering freemium and individual plan options in multiple markets. Their product includes both ambient documentation and conversational AI features. US availability and pricing for individual physicians should be verified directly with Nabla.
DeepScribe
Nabla
For US Independent Physicians
If you're a solo or small-group independent physician in the US, Nabla's individual access makes it worth evaluating. DeepScribe's procurement model makes it harder to adopt without a group. And there's a third option — NoPajamaTime — that was built from the ground up specifically for independent US physicians who are making this decision themselves.